Our work / Connecting finance and operational systems
Illustrative scenario

Connecting finance and operational systems

Client Company A Ltd runs sales, invoicing and financial reporting in separate tools. This project connects them through an integration layer so each record is entered once and reporting draws on the same data.

Placeholder client name, logo and context. This is an illustrative scenario, not a completed project. Replace with verified details before publishing.
Client
Client Company A LtdDistribution and retail
Service
Integration and automation
Scope
API integration, data mapping, reconciliation
Status
Illustrative

Context

Client context

A mid-sized distributor with a sales team, a finance team and a small operations group, each using the tool that suited them at the time. [Placeholder: replace with the real client context and size, with permission.]

Challenge

The challenge

Orders were typed into the sales tool, then retyped into invoicing, then adjusted by hand for monthly reports.

  • Duplicate data entry between sales and finance
  • Invoices and reports that did not always agree
  • Month-end reconciliation that took days of manual checking

Constraints

Requirements and constraints

  • Keep the existing tools in use during the project
  • Agree one source of truth for each type of record
  • Every transfer must be traceable and recoverable
  • Staff continue normal work during rollout

Solution

Proposed solution and architecture

An integration layer sits between the three systems. It maps fields, validates records before they move, retries or flags failures, and compares totals across systems each day.

  • Data mapping agreed with record owners
  • Validation rules before transfer
  • Error queue with alerts for failed records
  • Daily reconciliation report
SalesInvoicingAccountingShared recordsReportsIntegration layerMap dataValidateReconcile

Our role

Medici Labs' role

What Medici Labs does

  • Requirements workshops and data mapping
  • Integration design and build
  • Testing with realistic data and reconciliation checks
  • Documentation, training and agreed support

What the client provides

  • Name an owner for each data type
  • Provide test access to each system
  • Review and approve mappings and reports

Delivery

Implementation approach

  1. Discover

    Map the systems, fields and manual hand-offs.

  2. Design

    Agree mappings, validation rules and failure handling.

  3. Build and test

    Develop connectors, then test with sample records and reconcile.

  4. Release

    Run old and new processes side by side, then switch over.

Outcome

Outcome and current status

Illustrative scenario. No measured results exist for this example. For a real project this section reports verified outcomes only.

Intended aims

  • Less manual administration
  • More consistent operational information
  • A faster month-end close, measured against the client's own baseline

Next steps

Lessons and next steps

Agreeing who owns each record type early prevents most disputes later. Next steps could include connecting stock or e-commerce data.

Facing something similar?

Tell us what you are working on. We'll help you identify a practical path forward.